Looking like it's working and it actually working are not the same thing

July 23, 2026
Written by:

Last week I wrote about urgency making your marketing worse. About the instinct, under pressure, to do more of what you already know how to do.

Several of you replied. The version that came back most often wasn't "I've done this." It was "I'm in this right now."

So this week I want to go one layer deeper. Because there's a specific kind of pressure that shows up at early stage, and it's subtler than the urgency trap. More insidious, actually, because it can look like progress.

The metrics that arrive too early

I sat with a team this week looking at paid acquisition data. The numbers were all over the place. Same campaign, same period, same targeting. CAC ranging from well under a hundred to well over four hundred.

The instinct was to cut the expensive cohorts and double down on the cheap ones.

We didn't. Because the campaigns had been live less than ten days, there were attribution gaps in the tracking setup, and the consent framework hadn't been properly tested yet. The data wasn't wrong exactly. It was just too early to mean anything.

Cutting based on it would have been a decision. It just wouldn't have been an informed one.

This is one of the most common places I see early stage founders lose budget. Not because they spend it on the wrong things. Because they react to signals before those signals are legible. The discipline, in that moment, is to hold your nerve and fix the measurement before you touch the spend.

The community that needs to look full before it is

A different client this week, different problem, same shape.

They're launching a platform. Good product. Real audience. The challenge is that nobody wants to be first through the door. A community that looks empty on day one stays empty. The social proof has to exist before the organic growth can follow. But you can't manufacture social proof. You can only create the conditions for it.

What we're building with them isn't a big launch campaign. It's a small, deliberate seeding process. Repurposed content. Placeholder activity from the founding team. A handful of early members who've been briefed on what they're helping build. Nothing that looks impressive from the outside.

Everything designed to mean that when someone does arrive, they land somewhere that feels alive.

This is slower than a launch. It's also the only version that works.

The pattern

Both of these are the same problem underneath.

There's a version of your business that exists in the data right now. And there's a version that's actually being built, in the infrastructure and the processes and the compounding relationships. The gap between the two creates pressure. The pressure to show something. To have something to report. To look like it's working before it is.

The founders I see navigate this well are the ones who've separated the two conversations. They know what the numbers mean right now, in the context of where they actually are. They're not managing the perception of progress. They're managing the actual work of building it.

That distinction sounds simple. In a board meeting or an investor update, it's one of the harder things to hold.

The one thing to do this week

Look at the metric you're under the most pressure to move right now.

Then ask: is the infrastructure in place for that metric to be legible? Is the tracking clean, the attribution reliable, the sample size large enough to mean something?

If the answer is no, the first job isn't to move the number. It's to build the conditions under which the number can be trusted.

A decision made on noisy data isn't a decision. It's a guess with a spreadsheet attached.

Drop me a line if this is the conversation you're in right now. I've been in it with several clients this week, and the version of it each founder is navigating is slightly different. I'd like to hear yours.

PS. The same logic applies to LinkedIn company pages, community portals, and early email lists. The number looks small because it is small. That's not a problem to solve with more activity. It's a stage to move through with the right activity. If you want to talk through what "right" looks like for where you are, reply and let's figure it out.